Blockchain is reconfiguring traditional banking by shifting trust from central ledgers to cryptographic protocols and distributed consensus, making certain intermediation functions redundant. Research by Christian Catalini at Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Joshua Gans at University of Toronto demonstrates that tokenization and decentralized recordkeeping can lower coordination and verification costs, enabling faster settlement and novel forms of asset ownership. Hyun Song Shin at Bank for International Settlements highlights that these technical changes matter because they alter where value is created and who captures it, with direct relevance for payments, custody and cross-border flows that underpin household economies in many regions.
Decentralization and cost reduction
Core technological drivers are consensus algorithms, immutable ledgers and smart contracts that automate rules once enforced by banks. Arvind Narayanan at Princeton University explains that consensus mechanisms remove the single point of failure in ledger maintenance, while smart contracts encode conditional transfers that previously required legal and operational overhead. These attributes reduce reconciliation labor and shorten clearing cycles, which is why trade finance pilots and tokenized securities experiments are emerging in city financial districts and regional markets alike.
Risks, energy and societal effects
Disruption carries consequences for financial stability, regulatory oversight and labour in banking centers. Research by Dilip Ratha at World Bank documents how remittance-dependent territories could see lower costs but also new intermediaries replacing traditional correspondent banks, reshaping local access to liquidity. The Bank for International Settlements analysis by Hyun Song Shin warns that faster, permissionless rails can complicate monetary transmission and oversight. Environmental concerns also arise where proof-of-work networks concentrate energy use, a pattern tracked by the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance at University of Cambridge.
What makes this shift unique is its blend of technical immutability and economic reallocation: communities gain programmable money and faster settlement, yet legacy trust architectures and legal frameworks retain importance. Regulators, banks and technologists are responding with permissioned ledgers, custody rules and interoperability standards that aim to capture efficiencies while managing systemic risk. Evidence from academic and institutional studies shows the transformation is incremental and uneven across territories, driven by local market needs, regulatory choices and the cultural embedding of financial practices.
